Overview

All of my apps stopped working with WeatherKit this morning. They all return an "Error Domain=WeatherDaemon.WDSJWTAuthenticatorServiceListener.Errors Code=2" error. I am certain that the WeatherKit capability added (in project) and enabled as a Capability & App Service (on developer portal for the identifier). All other iCloud features of my apps are working as expected. I have also done all the normal troubleshooting using codesign / security cms, etc. to verify entitlements. I created the following simple project to verify the integration. import WeatherKit import CoreLocation struct ContentView: View { @State private var temp: Measurement<UnitTemperature>? = nil var body: some View { VStack { if let t = temp { Text("\(t.value.rounded())°\(t.unit.symbol)") } else { Text("Fetching…") .task { let service = WeatherService() do { let location = CLLocation(latitude: 50.318668, longitude: -114.917710) let weather = try await service.weather(for: location, including: .current) temp = weather.temperature } catch { print("Error:", error) } } } } } } Any ideas what may be happening?

Hello, I’m an individual developer who received a termination notice for my Apple Developer account almost 30 days ago. I have submitted multiple appeals through the official App Review Board form and follow-ups through Developer Support, but I haven’t received any response. I’ve done everything possible to comply, including acknowledging any concerns raised and confirming that I will not repeat any mistakes. I’ve also stopped distribution of the app in question and committed to focus only on compliant development moving forward. With the 30-day deadline approaching and no answer, I’m extremely concerned and frustrated. I’m asking here because I have no other channel left to get a human response or confirmation that my appeals are being reviewed. I understand the importance of Apple’s rules, and I fully support fair enforcement. But complete silence in such a critical matter is very hard to handle for a small developer. If anyone from Apple sees this, please help escalate the case or provide guidance. I just want a fair chance to continue working within the platform. Thank you.

We have received a message stating that during the account registration process or after creating an account, you provided Apple with fraudulent and/or false account information, documents, or other false statements about yourself or the applications you submitted. ” May I ask which document or information has been identified as false information? We can provide an explanation for this

I’m experiencing a critical issue with my app’s review process under my developer account (App ID: 6744330283). The app was initially approved and published, but starting with version 1.2 and later updates, every submission faces prolonged review times (over 1 week) only to be automatically rejected without clear justification. I’ve resubmitted multiple times, confirmed compliance with guidelines, and even tested with minor changes—same result. Meanwhile, a separate developer account of mine gets approvals within 24 hours for the same type of apps, suggesting an account-specific issue. Actions Taken: Appealed via the Resolution Center and App Review Board. Communicated via email and even a Meet call with Apple Support, but was told my account has "no issues." The app has real users and active IAPs, making this disruption unacceptable. Next Steps: I’m pursuing legal counsel in LA to escalate this, as the lack of transparency is harming my business. Questions for the community: Has anyone resolved a similar issue? Are there hidden account flags or escalation paths beyond standard channels? Any advice or shared experiences would be greatly appreciated.

How would one interpret guideline 5.4 VPN? It states: "Apps offering VPN services may not sell, use, or disclose to third parties any data for any purpose, and must commit to this in their privacy policy" Does that mean you cannot integrate Ad SDKs inside apps offering VPN functionality? Or does this only apply VPN Traffic? So using third party Ad SDKs like Admob is fine, as long you don't share any VPN traffic data? (e.g. Admob runs inside the App Process/UI, but doesn't run inside NEPacketTunnel) We have a similar case (and couldn't get clarification from App Review so far)

Hi everyone, I’m relatively new to the App Store and currently facing a frustrating review situation. I’d appreciate any advice or insight. Here’s the timeline: June 6: I submitted version 1.0 of my app. It was approved the same day. June 10: I submitted version 1.1 with a few important bug fixes. The app quickly moved from “Waiting for Review” to “In Review”, and stayed in that status for 6 full days, with no activity or feedback. I submitted an expedited review request and contacted support. They replied that the review “started on June 12,” although App Store Connect shows In Review since June 10. Based on advice from other developers, I assumed the app was stuck due to a rare issue. So, on June 16, I removed the submission and resubmitted the exact same version 1.1 — hoping this would reset the process. Unfortunately, the app then stayed in “Waiting for Review” for more than 48 hours. I wasn’t planning to cancel again, but I discovered a critical gameplay bug that had to be fixed. On June 18, I submitted a new build as version 1.2. It’s currently in “Waiting for Review”. ❓My questions: Is there anything I might be doing wrong that’s causing these delays? Could I be missing some required metadata or review notes? Or is this normal behavior for new developer accounts? I’d really appreciate any guidance — I just want to ensure I’m not overlooking something important. Thanks in advance! App ID: 6746811958

Dear App Store Review Team, I am writing to express my concern regarding the lack of response concerning the review of my application, which has been under review since June 2nd with no updates or further communication. This delay is negatively impacting my business negotiations, as my clients already have access to the Android version and are now waiting for the iOS version. My professional credibility is being affected, as I cannot provide them with a clear response or estimated availability date. I have made a significant investment in developing this iPhone version, purchasing the required hardware, licenses, and tools, trusting that I would receive professional and fair treatment from Apple. I kindly request an update on the status of the review and a prompt resolution, as this situation is causing me considerable harm. Sincerely,

If I do this: NSString *name = @"Jim"; NSMenuItem *menuItem = [[NSMenuItem alloc]init]; // Analyze does show localization warning when format string is used. menuItem.title = [NSString stringWithFormat:@"Hello %@",name]; I expect to get the following warning: User-facing text should use localized string macro But I don't. However if I do this: menuItem.title = @"What"; I do get the warning about localization as expected and as desired when I run Analyze. Is this considered a bug? Thanks!

I'm trying to update data displayed in my Watch Complications (WidgetKit). I have an iOS app that sends data to the Apple Watch using WCSession.default.transferUserInfo. However, the data only updates on the complications or widgets after I open the watchOS app manually. Ideally, I'd like the Watch widget/complication to reflect the updated data as soon as it's sent from the iPhone, without requiring the user to open the Watch app.

Dear Apple Review, I submitted my app for review on June 11th, and it has remained in “Waiting for Review” status for the past 8 days without any updates or communication. As this is my first app submission, I was expecting the review process to follow the usual 24–48 hour timeframe, as publicly stated. I’ve noticed that other apps are being reviewed and even updated multiple times in the meantime, which makes this prolonged delay particularly concerning. I would greatly appreciate it if you could look into the status of my submission and provide any updates or guidance regarding the next steps. Thank you for your time and support. Best regards,

We are preparing to submit a new app that shares some functionality and with an app we have previously distributed on the App Store. The Codebase will be different (the existing one was developped using React JS and the Second one usinf SWIFT). While the new app includes updated features, a redesigned interface, and is intended for a different user audience, we would like to confirm in advance whether submitting it as a separate app (with a new Bundle ID) is acceptable under current App Store Review Guidelines. In particular, we would appreciate clarification regarding Guideline 4.3 (Spam), to ensure that the submission will not be considered a duplicate or unnecessarily repetitive version of our existing app. Could you please advise on this matter?

I have an existing app that uses SwiftData and now want to add widgets. I added the widget extension, created an App Group to use for the main app target and widget targets and successfully created the widget. However, when testing the updates I often experience data loss - as though the including the widget extension is creating a new instance of modelContainer. Am I missing something to ensure there won't be any data loss when adding the App Group and widget extension? For additional context: I’ve followed the Backyard Birds example code except that it uses a separate app package. My app does not use an external app package, but I am using some elements of the DataGeneration file. My files containing the SwiftData models have Target Memberships for both the main app target and widget extension target. In the TimelineProvider for my widgets, I'm doing the following: let modelContext = ModelContext(DataGeneration.container) init() { DataGeneration.generateAllData(modelContext: modelContext) } My DataGeneration file (simplified) is as follows. When adding the widget target, I sometimes see the log for "Creating instance of DataGeneration". import Foundation import SwiftData @Model class DataGeneration { var requiresInitialization: Bool = true init(requiresInitialization: Bool = true) { self.requiresInitialization = requiresInitialization } private func generateInitialData(modelContext: ModelContext) { if requiresInitialization { let budget = Budget() modelContext.insert(budget) requiresInitialization = false } } private static func instance(with modelContext: ModelContext) -> DataGeneration { if let result = try! modelContext.fetch(FetchDescriptor<DataGeneration>()).first { logger.info("Found instance of DataGeneration") return result } else { logger.info("Creating instance of DataGeneration") let instance = DataGeneration() modelContext.insert(instance) return instance } } static func generateAllData(modelContext: ModelContext) { let instance = instance(with: modelContext) instance.generateInitialData(modelContext: modelContext) } } extension DataGeneration { static let container = try! ModelContainer(for: schema, configurations: [.init(isStoredInMemoryOnly: DataGenerationOptions.inMemoryPersistence)]) static let schema = SwiftData.Schema([ DataGeneration.self, Budget.self ]) }

I am sort of trying to do the opposite of what others are doing. I have a target called CopyFramework that creates a CopyFramework.framework within my main xcproj file. I set up this target because a specific framework (we can call it Tools.xcframework) is distributed as a binary. That framework file lives within the code. Tools.xcframework is structured like so Tools.xcframework (Coding/testBuild/DynamicToolFrameworks/Tools.xcframework) info.plist ios-arm64/ Tools.xcframework/ Tools (executable file) Tools.bundle Headers/ Info.plist Modules/ Tools.swiftmodule/ arm64-apple-ios.abi.json arm64-apple-ios.private.swiftinterface arm64-apple-ios.swiftdoc arm64-apple-ios.swiftinterface module.modulemap module.private.modulemap PrivateHeaders/ ios-arm64_x86_64-simulator/ When the CopyFramework target is run xcode does a few steps which copy the correct version of this framework to derived data. Process Tools.xcframework (iOS) Coding/testBuild/DynamicToolFrameworks/Tools.xcframework /Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/testBuild-sha/Build/Products/Debug-iphoneos/Tools.framework ios cd /Users/calebkierum/Coding/testBuild builtin-process-xcframework --xcframework Coding/testBuild/DynamicToolFrameworks/Tools.xcframework --platform ios --target-path Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/testBuild-sha/Build/Products/Debug-iphoneos Meaning essentially that the Tools.xcframework for the proper platform is taken from Tools.xcframework/ios-arm64 and copied to Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/testBuild-sha/Build/Products/Debug-iphoneos/Tools.xcframework I am writing a Swift Package that needs to be able to reference the correct Tools.xcframework. I have set it up like so: let package = Package( name: "CoreObjC", platforms: [.iOS(.v17), .macCatalyst(.v17)], products: [ .library(name: "CoreObjC", targets: ["CoreObjC"]), ], dependencies: [ // Does something to here ??? //.package(path: "../testBuild") ], targets: [ .target( name: "CoreObjC", dependencies: [ // Here I would like to be referencing the CopyFramework.framework target within my buildTest.xcproj file .product(name: "CopyFramework", package: /*??? its not in a swift package its a part of an xcproj file*/) ], path: "CoreObjC", publicHeadersPath: "Headers", linkerSettings: [ .linkedFramework("Tools", .when(platforms: [.iOS])), .linkedLibrary("c++") ] ), ], cxxLanguageStandard: CXXLanguageStandard.gnucxx14 ) Now obviously this does not work. I do not know how to communicate to the Package.swift file that the binary dependency is a framework target within my xcproj file. If I do run the target CopyFramework followed by building CoreObjC it works though (so long as you comment out the bits trying to reference CopyFramework). Running the CopyFramework target processes the Tools.xcframework and copies the proper xcframework sub folder to Derived data and the Swift Package build system seems to be able to see it. Is there a way I can get rid of this manual step? Make it so that when I build the CoreObjC target (swift package) that either CopyFramework is run or some other process is run to get the proper xcframework out of Coding/testBuild/DynamicToolFrameworks/Tools.xcframework and into DerivedData? Is it even theoretically possible to have a Swift Package reference a target in a normal xcproj file?

When I build my app for iPad OS, either 26, or 18.5, as well as iOS on 16.5 from Xcode 26 with UIDesignRequiresCompatibility enabled my app is crashing as it loads the main UIViewController, a subclassed UITabBarController which is being loaded programatically from a Storyboard from another SplashScreen ViewController. On i(Pad)OS 18.5 I get this error: Thread 1: "Could not instantiate class named _TtGC5UIKit17UICoreHostingViewVCS_21ToolbarVisualProvider8RootView_ because no class named _TtGC5UIKit17UICoreHostingViewVCS_21ToolbarVisualProvider8RootView_ was found; the class needs to be defined in source code or linked in from a library (ensure the class is part of the correct target)" On iPadOS 26 I get this error: UIKitCore/UICoreHostingView.swift:54: Fatal error: init(coder:) has not been implemented There is no issue building from Xcode 16.4, regardless of targeted i(Pad)OS.

Hello, I'm trying to subscribe to AVPlayerItem status updates using Combine and it's bridge to Swift Concurrency – .values. This is my sample code. struct ContentView: View { @State var player: AVPlayer? @State var loaded = false var body: some View { VStack { if let player { Text("loading status: \(loaded)") Spacer() VideoPlayer(player: player) Button("Load") { Task { let item = AVPlayerItem( url: URL(string: "https://sample-videos.com/video321/mp4/360/big_buck_bunny_360p_5mb.mp4")! ) player.replaceCurrentItem(with: item) let publisher = player.publisher(for: \.status) for await status in publisher.values { print(status.rawValue) if status == .readyToPlay { loaded = true break } } print("we are out") } } } else { Text("No video selected") } } .task { player = AVPlayer() } } } After I click on the "load" button it prints out 0 (as the initial status of .unknown) and nothing after – even when the video is fully loaded. At the same time this works as expected (loading status is set to true): struct ContentView: View { @State var player: AVPlayer? @State var loaded = false @State var cancellable: AnyCancellable? var body: some View { VStack { if let player { Text("loading status: \(loaded)") Spacer() VideoPlayer(player: player) Button("Load") { Task { let item = AVPlayerItem( url: URL(string: "https://sample-videos.com/video321/mp4/360/big_buck_bunny_360p_5mb.mp4")! ) player.replaceCurrentItem(with: item) let stream = AsyncStream { continuation in cancellable = item.publisher(for: \.status) .sink { if $0 == .readyToPlay { continuation.yield($0) continuation.finish() } } } for await _ in stream { loaded = true cancellable?.cancel() cancellable = nil break } } } } else { Text("No video selected") } } .task { player = AVPlayer() } } } Is this a bug or something?

Three months ago I molded a mold program. I believe could be tweaked and tried unlined zero code. swear. anyway I would like to scale with some people if I can go to commercial area code phoned series and calls.and if I have rights. but my next moves for them. on iOS I think they should have a seri settings. where they can call seri.on settings, and it jump many codes-and navigation is hard. plus I think seri can help in settings expecially since seri settings is verbal drop. if the words fit or are similar it cues goes to but you have to hard call the switch.so there’s no hey no Sami where you setting no Sammy right I think it could skip cauldron and everything verbally either. Seri settings I think iOS should try it.

Dear all, The scroll to top functionality of the tabItem does not scroll to the actual top of the view, when a list / scrollView is embedded in a tabView. Tapping the tabItem brings the view to the mid-point of the navigationTitle, leaving the navigationTitle half-blurred in the new iOS26: I believe that the same issue was present in previous iOS versions as well. Do you experience the same problem, or am I doing something wrong? The code is below. var body: some View { TabView { NavigationStack { List { ForEach(0..<100) { i in Text(i.formatted()) } } .navigationBarTitleDisplayMode(.large) .navigationTitle("List") } .tabItem { Label("List", systemImage: "list") // Tapping here while the list is scrolled down does not bring the entire list to the actual top } } } }

I'm looking to maximise my Watch app's widget to be as up to date as possible. If we imagined the app was a simple step counter, and we wanted to display the users count as up to date as possible. We can conclude: We don't care about widget timelines beyond the current entry as we can't predict the future! We need to refresh the count as often as possible The refresh should be very quick with a straightforward HealthKit query, no networking or heavy work needed. We will assume the user has the complication/widget on their active Watch face. With the standard WidgetKit APIs we can expire the timeline after 15 minutes and in my experimentation a Watch app can usually update its widget timeline at that frequency if it's on the Watch face. I'm experimenting with two methods to try and improve refreshes further A user's step count might not have recently changed when the timeline update is called. I was therefore looking into the HealthKit enableBackgroundDelivery API (which requires the HealthKit Background Delivery entitlement to be enabled) to get updates limited to once an hour from a HKObserverQuery, I can then call the WidgetCenter.shared.reloadAllTimelines() from there. WatchOS also support the BGAppRefreshTaskRequest(identifier:"") and .backgroundTask(.appRefresh) APIs. I can request updates once every 15 minutes here too and then call the WidgetCenter.shared.reloadAllTimelines(). With option 1, this update opportunity is great as it will specifically update when there's new steps so even once an hour this would be helpful (A real shame to be limited to once an hour even if this used up WidgetKit standard reload budgets: FB13879817, FB11677132, FB10016177). But I can't determine if this update takes away one of the standard timeline expiration updates that already run 4 times an hour? Could I observe additional Health types to get additional updates? Do I need the Background Modes Capability as well as the HealthKit Background Delivery for this in Xcode or just the HealthKit one? With option 2, I can't find a suitable option in the (short) list of supported background modes in Xcode. Does not selecting any mean my app will get 0 refreshes from this route and so should not be implemented in my use case?

No matter what, the LanguageModelSession always returns very lengthy / verbose responses. I set the maximumResponseTokens option to various small numbers but it doesn't appear to have any effect. I've even used this instructions format to keep responses between 3-8 words but it returns multiple paragraphs. Is there a way to manage LLM response length? Thanks.

Hi Apple Dev Team & Community, We’ve encountered an issue with background location updates when using an XCFramework we’ve built from our main app. Context: We have a standalone app called TravelSafely that reliably performs background location updates and alerts, even during sleep mode. From this app, we extracted some core functionality into an XCFramework, including location management, and provided it as an SDK to a client. We created a demo app to test this SDK in isolation. Problem: In the demo app, we notice that location updates work fine in the foreground. However, in the background or sleep mode, location updates sometimes stop completely. When we bring the app to the foreground again, location resumes. This does not happen in the original standalone app. What We’ve Already Checked: UIBackgroundModes includes location Info.plist has the required permissions Location is started correctly using startUpdatingLocation We maintain strong references and use background tasks as needed Question: Why would an app using a binary XCFramework (with location logic) behave differently from the original app in terms of background execution? Is there any known issue or recommendation when working with SDKs/XCFrameworks that need to manage background tasks and location updates? Any insights or recommendations to maintain proper background behavior would be highly appreciated. Thank you!